Published by at 12:58 pm under Global Warming,Governance,Justice

“Climate Change catastrophism is the biggest scientific fraud that has ever occurred.”

(Ian Plimer, emiritus professor of Earth Sciences at the University of Melbourne, professor of Mining Geology at the University of Adelaide and author of “Not For Greens” (2014).)

“Future generations will wonder in bemused amazement that the early twenty-first century’s developed world went into hysterical panic over a globally averaged temperature increase of a few tenths of a degree, and, on the basis of gross exaggerations of highly uncertain computer projections combined into implausible chains of inference, proceeded to contemplate a roll-back of the industrial age.”

(Dr. Richard S. Lindzen, Alfred P. Sloan Professor of Atmospheric Sciences, MIT; member of the National Academy of Sciences; and former lead author, UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.)

In the year or so leading up to the Paris Conference on Climate Change in December 2015, there was a tremendous increase in the flood of dire predictions by desperate Climate Change Catastrophists. We were told that we were all going to die from flooding or drought or storm or heat or starvation unless we stopped burning fossil fuels and putting carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. (Thereby wrecking the developed, industrialized economies of western civilization and denying the right of underdeveloped nations to catch up.) They said that Climate Change was the worst peril the planet faced – worse than terrorism or financial crises or wars or invasions or plagues or poverty, or anything!

In the 1960’s and ’70’s, they screamed we were all going to die because burning fossil fuels was going to bring on an Ice Age.

In the 1980′ and ’90’s, another bunch claimed we were all going to die because burning fossil fuels was going to bring on “Global Warming” and make the earth too hot for life. When the warming stopped and cooling began they switched to “Climate Change”.

They lied. None of their predictions have come true!

But, incredibly, they’ve been able to capitalize on the agendas and/or egos of the public, media, entertainment, academic, bureaucratic and religious elites who have pressured weak-minded politicians in western governments into making a multitude of economy-wrecking decisions.

We certainly should immediately stop the folly that is wrecking our western civilizations’ economies. Multi-billions of our dollars have been diverted from useful infrastructure repair and construction, and from needful pollution control projects, to finance the foolish pursuit of climate control. The list of waste on “research”, windmill and solar panel farms, fabulous conventions in exotic locales, media PR, government subsidies, movies, TV, etc. is endless.

Those in positions of authority like Obama, the Pope and Wynne who spout a never-ending stream of outrageous lies, will go down in history as either woefully ignorant or willfully wicked. For example, when Obama mouths off about the world being warmer today than it has been in 800,000 years he is expecting that no one with a high school education will remember that the world was at least one degree warmer in 1000 AD than in 2000 AD. These cretins, and their fellow travellers, are usefully called “Climate Change Catastrophists”.

The Catastrophists base their positions on computer projections, not real, scientific, field research.  The 2,000 e-mails of the 2009 Climategate scandal exposed 42 of them. When 104 of their models were tested using historic data to predict current realities, 102 of their forecasts  proved to be totally wrong, some ridiculously so. Yet these models are used by the Catastrophists as the basis for the catastrophic outcomes they predict!

More than 12,000 papers claiming to deal with climate were “scoured” by two students who were instructed to look for any that “proved” catastrophic, anthropogenic global warming.They initially found 64, which, on further scrutiny, were reduced to 41.

The so-called “consensus” of 97% was based on a U. of Illinois student’s survey of 10,257 earth scientists’ papers, only 77 of which claimed catastrophic climate change was imminent and 75 claimed ii was attributable to human activity.  .

Meanwhile, in the real world of field investigation of climate history in glacier, ocean and lake bed cores, plus geological surveys, plus temperature measurements on land and sea and in the atmosphere, thousands of real scientists using all the tools and techniques available today have confirmed in more than 545 studies that there is absolutely no evidence for catastrophic global warming and that humanity’s burning of fossil fuels contributes a miniscule less than 1/4 of 1% to the Greenhouse Effect! Many petitions from groups of scientists, including one from over 31,400 scientists, have reported the truth for nearly 20 years.

The science IS settled – by over 545 studies conducted by thousands of real scientists researching real world conditions – not by a handful of computer pickers projecting outcomes from a limited list of short term data.

Why then, if the evidence is so overwhelmingly against them, have the Catastrophists been able to braindirty a significant number of influential people into supporting their cause and their lies?    

Because it’s not about climate!

The Romans had a phrase: “Cui bono?” which means “Who benefits?” Today we also say “Follow the money!” Money is power, power earns money.

Who are these people? They are as motley a collection of unlike characters as ever assembled in history. They are united by two basic characteristics – a sociopathic hatred of the personal freedom and prosperity of the vast majority of humanity, (they exclude themselves from this condemnation of course.), and they are all “Leftists”.

Climate Change Catastrophists may be classified in two categories – Beneficiaries and Enablers.

There are three groups of Beneficiaries. 1. Faux scientists/academics who mainly hang out in protected university cloisters and require grants to fund their ‘research’. These are the Swindlers who periodically issue sensational predictions of future events based on computer  manipulations of a limited amount of selected data.

  1. Radical environmental groups like the Sierra Club and Greenpeace which may have begun as highminded volunteer organizations but which have morphed into gigantic money-sucking machines that spend their ill-gotten gains interfering with humanity-benefiting projects wherever they can find them.
  2. Greedy corporations, established and new, who have understood how to capitalize on fear and ignorance and sell new light bulbs and solar panels and windmills and cars and gimmicks ad nauseum. Absolutely none of these ballyhooed ‘solutions’ work and absolutely none would ever have come into existence without massive subsidies of taxpayers’ money.

There are two groups of Enablers. 1. Super-rich, limousine LiberalSocialists like George Soros and Maurice Strong. They finance the activities of the first two beneficiaries through their blind trusts and shadow Foundations. George Soros made his billions on the stock market. He has been indicted for insider trading. Former Canadian Maurice Strong, as Chairman of Ontario Hydro, started that once-magnificent organization on its downward spiral and moved to Beijing, the capital of Communist China. As Secretary-General of the 1992 Conference of Environment and Development in Rio, Maurice Strong stated: “Isn’t the only hope for our planet that the industrialized nations collapse? Isn’t it our responsibility to bring it about?”  That conference led directly to the Kyoto Accord and Agenda 21.

  1. Ignorant, cowardly politicians who have forgotten their high school science and kow tow to the panic-mongering Swindlers. They have already authorized the diversion of billions of taxpayer dollars from useful projects to subsidizing the cockamamie futilities of climate control.

There is a third group who both benefit and enable. 1. Mainstream media, including broadcast,  print, and Hollywood movies. They operate on the principle that the only good news is bad news, and, if it’s not sensational it won’t sell. (papers, magazines, tickets, etc.) Thus they benefit by revenue and enable by disseminating the claims of the panic mongering Swindlers. And it is truly remarkable how quickly and irresponsibly they can switch gears. Here are just a few examples from the short term cool PHASE of the 1960’s and ’70’s, and the short term warm PHASE of the 1980’s and ’90’s.

“After a week of discussions on the causes of climate change, an assembly of specialists from several continents seem to have reached unanimous agreement on only one point: it is getting colder.” New York Times, January 30, 1961.

“In the next 50 years fine dust that humans discharge into the atmosphere by burning fossil fuel will screen out so much of the sun’s rays that the earth’s average temperature could fall by six degrees. Sustained emissions over five to 10 years, could be sufficient to trigger an ice age.” Washington Post, July 9, 1971.

“This cooling has already killed hundreds of thousands of people. If it continues and no strong action is taken, it will cause world famine, world chaos and world war, and this could all come about before the year 2000.” Lowell Ponte , “The Cooling”, 1976.


“A global warming trend could bring heat waves, dust-dry farmland and disease. the experts said. Under this scenario, the resort town of Ocean City , Md., will lose 39 feet of shoreline by 2000 and a total of 85 feet within the next 25 years.” San Jose Mercury News, June 11, 1986.

“New York will probably be like Florida 15 years from now.” St. Louis Post-Dispatch, September 17, 1989.

“The planet could face an ecological and agricultural catastrophe by the next decade if global warming trends continue.” Carl Sagan, Buffalo News, October 15, 1990.

  1. Bureaucrats, ranging from those who write and push the catastrophic predictions of the UN’s IPCC, to those at the federal or state/provincial level who dole out the billions authorized by the politicians. They benefit by enhancing their positional power, and they enable by handing out taxpayers’ money.
  2. “Star” personalities, among whom Al Gore and Canadian David Suzuki stand out as classics who now and then descend from one of their several mansions to zip about the world in their fuel-guzzling vehicles hurling warnings as to how we mere mortals must behave or else. Their utterances have made them rich and have helped create a gullible audience.

Global Cooling/Global Warming/Climate Change is nothing but a monstrous cover by limousine LiberalSocialist elites (George Soros’s Davos Men) seeking to control the world by forcing prosperous western nations to wreck their economies by switching to “Green Power” and transferring what’s left of their wealth to third world countries to (supposedly) help them do the same. This “third world fund” is being negotiated to be between $100 Billion and $400 Billion per year! Jr. Trudeau promised to pay $2.5 Billion of Canadian taxpayers’ money into this fund his third week in office, even before the conference.

In 2011, Otto Edenhoffer, co-chair of the IPCC’s Working Group lll, declared that, “Basically, it’s a big mistake to discuss climate policy separately from the major themes of globalization. The climate summit (Cancun) is not a climate conference, but one of the largest economic conferences since the second World War. …. one must say clearly that we redistribute defacto the world’s wealth by climate policy.”

United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change executive secretary Christiana Figueres recently admitted that climate change “is not about the temperature. That is just a proxy. The discussion is about the decarbonization of the economy.”

At the previous UNFCCC meeting in 2012 at Doha, Qatar, Figueres let the cat out of the bag when she revealed that the goal of the whole process is a “complete transformation of the economic structure of the world.” Earlier this year (2015) she said “this is probably the most difficult task we have given ourselves, which is to intentionally transform the economic development model, for the first time in human history.” (See Obama’s “Fundamentally transform America.”)

Naomi Klein – radical socialist agitator – acknowledged that “progressive” policies on the environment are really about destroying market economies desired by Marx and fellow communists.

Christine Stewart – former Liberal MP for Northumberland – when Minister of the Environment in Jean Chretien’s government from 1997 to 1999, said; “No matter if the science is all phony …. Climate Change provides the greatest opportunity to bring about justice and equality in the world.”

Stephen Harper got it right in a 2002 fundraising letter when he was leader of Canadian Alliance. He wrote: ” (It’s) a socialist scheme to suck money out of wealth-producing nations.”

H.L. Mencken – noted U.S. journalist – wrote; “The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary.” (see ‘1984’)

He also wrote; “The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule.”

The Comintern failed in its mission to establish a one-world, socialist dictatorship headquartered in Moscow when the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics crashed. The United Nations, using Catastrophic Climate Change as the lever, has assumed that role.

A lot of Catastrophists, including the Pope and Obama, met at the UN in New york City the weekend of September 25 -27, 2015 to finalize the detailed actions, indicated in Agenda 21, that needed to be done to establish a one-world, socialist dictatorship by 2030. Whenever you see or hear that date mentioned, alarm bells should go off in your head!

They must be stopped.

December 2015.

(Footnote, February, 2016: The December 2015 UNFCCC conference in Paris crashed, partly because they couldn’t agree on the amount of the “Green Fund” and not enough attendees were willing to pay this obscene extortion no matter how much it would have been. The conference produced an “agreement” signifying absolutely nothing. It has no binding targets, just a bunch of “wouldn’t-it-be-nice-if” pledges. Therefore, there are no enforcement or funding mechanisms. The Chinese and Indians, among many others, basically told the conference to get stuffed and went home to continue building their coal-fired generating plants. But North American and western European “leaders” continue to spout folly and Jr. Trudeau has already sent 2.56 Billion dollars to somebody!)