on | Filed under Uncategorized

It should be pointed out that Italy’s Fascist Party was formed by the radical socialist, Mussolini. He copied the radical socialist leader of Russia’s Democratic Socialist Worker’ Party, Lenin. The policies and practices of Hitler’s National Socialist German Workers’ Party were a straight lift from the Communist and Fascist socialist parties. Regardless of the party name – Communist, Fascist, National Socialist, Khmer Rouge, Pathet Lao, Viet Minh, Shining Path, FARC etc. – all formed single-party dictatorships and were founded by radical socialists.

The Fascists and Nazis claimed to be different from, and bitter enemies of, the Communists, and managed to convince almost all the rest of the world that this was so. In reality, they were identical in all but how they controlled their economies and the method by which they intended to take over the world. They are such bitter enemies because they competed for support from among the same client class. It might be useful to think of it as Fascist  socialism versus Communist socialism.

The Fascists and Nazis left the ownership and the profits of the institutions of their economies in the hands of the existing owners (except Jewish owners) but strictly controlled their operations. The Communists expropriated all the institutions of their economy from their existing owners and used party apparatchiks to operate them.

The Fascists and Nazis intended to conquer other countries by war. The Communists intended to take over other countries from within.

All three parties were led by three of the most powerful, smooth-tongued orators of the twentieth century who were able to move their audiences to uncritical adoration.

The Concise Oxford Dictionary, 1956 edition, defined socialism as:  “(the) principle that individual freedom should be completely subordinated to (the) interests of (the) community.” [brackets mine] This definition was acknowledged by all – proponents and opponents alike – from the early 1800’s through the 1950’s.

In a public speech in Munich on July 22, 1922, Hitler asserted, “Whoever is prepared to make the national cause his own to such an extent that he knows no higher ideal than the welfare of his nation: …  that man is a socialist.” (“Nazi” comes from Nazional Socialistische Deutsches Arbeiters Partei – National Socialist German Workers Party).

In his book ‘Industry and Humanity’ published in 1918, MacKenzie King declared ; “In the conflict between the … interests of selfish (sic) individuals and the welfare of nations, the latter alone is entitled to consideration.”.

The LiberalSocialDemocrat (LSD) socialist linguists and educators who directed the publishing of dictionaries probably thought that Orwell’s “1984”, plus the reports from the Communist/Fascist/National socialist’s death camps were becoming so well publicized that socialism was getting a bad name. So they changed the definition! The transition began in the early ’60’s at the time of the Pearson-Kent LiberalSocialist regime in Canada and the Kennedys’ DemocratSocialist regime in the US.

1964 – Pears Cyclopedia: socialism “a form of society in which men and women are not divided into opposing economic classes but live together under conditions of approximate social and economic equality, using in common the means that lie to their hands of promoting social welfare.” [italics mine]

You will notice in the Pears definition that the linguists and educators were somewhat unsure as to the source of the means people were going to use in common, but, by the ’80’s, the definitions got right down to business!

1987 – The New Lexicon Webster’s Dictionary: socialism “a political and economic theory advocating collective ownership of the means of production and control of distribution.” [italics mine]

1990 – Webster’s New World Encyclopedia: socialism “movement aiming to establish a classless society by substituting public for private ownership of the means of production, distribution and exchange.” [italics mine]

1998 – The Canadian Oxford Dictionary: socialism “a political and economic theory of social organization which advocates that the community as a whole should own and control the means of production, distribution and exchange.” [italics mine]

Gone is any reference to the subordination of the individual to the collective.

There are four grades of socialism.

  1. Marxist and Fabian socialism. Cooperative, utopian communities in which all members are considered equals and decide the interests of the community together. Limited number of small, radical groups in isolated locations.
  2. LiberalSocialDemocrat (LSD) socialism. Multi-party oligarchies, led by Lenin’s “Useful idiots of the west”, elected/appointed to determine and satisfy the interests of their communities. Political parties can be replaced in elections if they guess wrong. Currently exist in a shrinking number of countries in North America, Western Europe, Australasia, Japan, India and Singapore. Increasingly stringent government regulations and restrictions, imposed in the name of bogus concern for environments and climate change, and in 2020 for Covid 19, is pushing these countries toward …….
  3. Fascist socialism. Autocratic, single-party dictatorships where the party leader(s) determine the interests of the community. Ownership of the institutions of the economy is left in the hands of private persons or corporations but operations are strictly controlled by the party. Italy and Germany were 20th century examples.
  4. Communist socialism. Autocratic, single-party dictatorships identical to Fascist socialism except the party seizes ownership of the institutions of the economy from their previous private or corporate owners and puts their operations in the hands of controllable party members. Russia and China began this way but reverted to Fascist socialism when Communism proved unable to feed their populations.

All dictatorships operate on the original, and still operative, socialist principle that the interests of the community – as they define them – are the only appropriate concern of government. When Louis XIV said “I am the State” and when the Chinese and Japanese emperors said they ruled with the mandate of Heaven, they were adhering to the socialist worldview. When the Khmer Rouge party slaughtered 25% of the population in Cambodia it did so “for the good of the country”. When Kennedy said “Ask what you can do for your country.” and when Clinton said “It takes a village to raise a child.” they were expressing an aspect of  socialism. Down through the ages, Pharoahs, Emperors, Kings, Caesars/Tzars/Kaisers, Premiers, Prime Ministers, Presidents, Chairmen, Secretaries, and sometimes just “Leaders” have led one-party socialist dictatorships.

LSD socialists talk about “happy” countries. What does that mean? Sheep are “happy”. Southern planters claimed their slaves were “happy”. The betas, gammas, deltas and epsilons in “Brave New World” were “happy”. Does engaging in meaningless work, then spending idle time smoking pot, twittering meaninglessly, screwing any and every Harry, Dick or Tom available, and spending what’s left of one’s time watching brain deadening TV or  playing mindless video games make people “happy”

It is deplorable that the LSD socialists of western civilization are called “Progressive”! They are the advance guard for radical socialism. They are like termites – eating away the vital foundations of their countries.

Have you noticed the similarity between the tactics employed by the National Socialists to bring down Germany’s Weimar Republic and the tactics employed by the LSD socialists to bring down the newborn Trump administration in the United States? Riots in the streets, mob violence, property destruction, physical assaults, prevention of speech, slander, fabrications, and phony antipathies based on ancestry or religion, etc., etc., etc.

Lenin quickly established the COMmunistINTERNational in Moscow to advise socialists around the world on how to take over their countries. When the Soviet Union crashed in 1989, its functions were taken over by the George Soros funded World Economic Forum – his Davos gang of oligarchic alphas – and the UN.

Turning now to “Lenin’s List”. First of all, it is unlikely that Lenin penned the list although he certainly wrote in favour of its content. Some of the terms did not exist prior to his death in 1924. There has been a minor attempt to link the list to Saul Alinsky, a notorious U.S. anti-establishment radical but his apostles deny a linkage. However, there is no doubt that the list is a distressingly accurate statement of the tactics employed by the host of single-party, socialist dictatorships that have destroyed the peace, freedom and prosperity of so many billions of people since the early days of the 20th century.

The List of tactics for seizing control of a country’s government institutions for Socialism is: .

1) Healthcare – Control healthcare and you control the people. Wow, number one tactic. There are few things scarier than a threat to one’s ability to function. If danger to health is predicted by “credentialed authorities”, people will do whatever  governors demand.

2) Poverty – Increase the poverty level as high as possible, poor people are easier to control and will not fight back if you are providing everything for them to live. Millions of Canadians have been locked out of their income-producing jobs. Governments are issuing borrowed money to enable them to live.

3) Debt – Increase the debt to an unsustainable level. That way you are able to increase taxes, and this will produce more poverty. Junior’s LiberalSocialist government has just announced they are planning to run a deficit of $343 billion in Fiscal ’21 which will most likely balloon to more than $400 Billion. Thus the combined debt of all Canadian governments will exceed $2 Trillion, an amount greater than our Gross National Product. In the U.S.A., during the 16 years of the Clinton/Bush Presidencies, the national debt grew from $5 Trillion to $9 Trillion. During the 8 Obama years the national debt grew from $9 Trillion to $21 Trillion.

4) Gun Control – Remove the ability to defend themselves from the Government. That way you are able to create a police state. In progress.

5) Welfare – Take control of every aspect of their lives (Food, Housing, and Income). See number 2.

6) Education – Take control of what people read and listen to – take control of what children learn in school. Already done.

7) Religion – Remove the belief in the God from the Government and schools. Already done. Furthermore, the LSD socialists in the west subsequently added – Destroy belief in and support for chastity, marriage, fidelity and the nuclear family.

8) Class Warfare – Divide the people into the wealthy and the poor. This will cause more discontent and it will be easier to tax the wealthy with the support of the poor.” Riots, looting, protests, violent rhetoric – anything to produce chaos in the streets.

This is the current situation in Canada and the United States and especially Europe. It’s the script for world conquest by socialism.

Henry Kissinger, Bill gates and other self-described “Notables” have publicly stated that the current “crisis” provides the opportunity to immediately install the “New World Order”. The only real question is whether we’ll end up with a ‘1984’ system of populations controlled by blocs, or whether it’ll be a ‘Brave New World’ of Davos alphas using the UN’s apparatchiks,  and state-supporting police and armed forces, to install Socialist International’s Agenda 21 and one-party, world government by 2030.

Personalism” is a new word for the ancient worldview that the welfare of the individual person should be given the foremost consideration in human affairs. Personalism is the true alternative to Socialism. What it boils down to is that in a society driven by the personalist worldview governments exist to serve and support their people while in a society driven by the socialist worldview the people exist to serve and support their governments. Which is better?


on | Filed under Uncategorized

Authors as varied as Margaret Atwood, Sinclair Lewis and Taylor Caldwell have portrayed Canada as a safe haven for individuals fleeing single-party dictatorships in the U.S.A. The following is a plea from a Canadian urging the few remaining advocates of personalism in the country to assume the task of convincing Canadian voters to reject the future into which the Truderal government is hurling us.

The corona virus doesn’t kill people or even make them sick. The corona virus attacks the protecting antibodies of a person’s pulmonary immune system. If the virus prevails over the antibodies, the person can get a cold, or the flu, or pneumonia, or worsened asthma, or other pulmonary disease. A person’s immune system is more vulnerable when they are elderly; an occupant of a high rise office or apartment tower or user of mass transit in a major urban centre; or an occupant of a long term care warehouse anywhere. In fact those are the features of virtually every case so far.

But “Cases” are the wrong measure of the situation. As of October 10, 2020, of the 9.6 million Canadians tested since March 2020, less than 2% (180,000) had the virus. Thus, more than 98% of the testeds’ immune systems either repelled the virus or were not exposed. The vast majority of that 2% did not become sick – the virus simply joined the zillions of other viruses and microbes that enjoy living in and on our bodies. Of the few who did get sick, the vast majority were treated and cured at home, and 0.1% of the testeds, or 9,600 people, died. In no possible way does this compare to historic pandemics and should never have been called one.

For years , cold, flu and pneumonia seasons have lasted from October to May. Instead of continuing to accumulate corona virus statistics to make things appear to be becoming ever more calamitous, officials should have started reporting a new 2020-2021 season’s stats starting in October 2020. In recent seasons, prior to the advent of the corona virus, the “normal” death toll from pulmonary diseases has been 8,000 to 10,000 Canadians per season. In the 2019-2020 season, the death toll “attributed” to the corona virus was 9,600 persons. The death toll from flu was reported to have been almost negligible. What happened? Is it possible that Officials attributed what was a death rate at the high end of a “normal” season’s to the corona virus in order to aid and abet the panic and sway ignorant politicians into imposing their drastic economy- and people-killing lockouts?

On November 22, 2020, Johns Hopkins University published a study confirming the fact that Covid-19 had had no effect on total deaths in the U.S. Detailed scrutiny of deaths from all causes in the last six years confirmed that deaths attributed to Covid-19 were offset by declines from all other causes. JHU deleted the report on November 26 – it didn’t support the proper narrative. Who could have the power to force a hugely prestigious institution like Johns Hopkins to delete the report of a research study whose data and conclusions they knew were accurate?

The Panic has proven to be an incredibly successful test of population control. And taking control of a nation’s health care system was the first in the Comintern’s list of eight tactics for turning a country into a single party, socialist dictatorship. If people are afraid for their lives they will do anything official authorities order them to do.

The mockingbird puppets in mainstream and social media are already chirping that those who detect manipulators behind the  corona virus panic are delirious whackadoos, or some other dismissive term, who should be ignored, and are being censored.

But, more and more authoritative voices in some mainstream and social media and respected think tank and medical publications are coming forward with soundly reasoned and supported denunciations of the entire range of responses by governments. Basically, they are pointing out that the actual numbers don’t support the claims of mass destruction. (See above ) And forecasts of even greater disaster in the future are based on models – all of which prove to be drastically too high when their due dates arrive. (Models are just computer speculations made from biased, incomplete or inaccurate inputs.) They are also questioning who/what is driving the hysterical responses of the politicians and officials who are destroying the lives of so many millions of their people.

Let’s look at what is already in the public domain.

* In the early days of the Panic, some notables including Henry Kissinger and Bill Gates declared that the “crisis” offered an excellent opportunity to install a “New World Order”. In the summer of 2020, the terms Reset and Great Reset replaced “New World Order” (It smacked too much of “Brave New World”) to describe the destruction of all the basic conditions of personal freedom and prosperity remaining in the so-called “Free World”. The resetters have been around for at least a couple of centuries but really hit their stride after the dislocations of World War ll. They are as motley a collection of different interest/advocacy/cause groups and individuals as ever cooperated to achieve a goal. Their one, unifying conviction is the principle that individual rights should be completely subordinated to the interests of the community. The “interests of the community” are as each resetter group or individual decides of course, which raises the interesting question of which interests will prevail when the resetters take control of the world.

* In the 1960’s, the enviro- and eco- radicals began their aggressive tactics. They initially focussed on such issues as saving the whales and rain forests and cleaning up waterways.They soon morphed into money-grubbing  collection agencies angrily frustrating beneficial projects in order to generate publicity and secure funding for their annual galas in some of the most exotic, luxurious locales in the world. When “Global Cooling” failed to cover the world in glaciers they turned on a dime to “Global Warming” which failed to materialize, so on to “Climate Change” which didn’t happen, and now it’s “Climate Crisis”. Despite all the real-world, scientific evidence debunking the entire fraud, ignorant politicians continue to shovel billions of their people’s money into worthless projects and to regulate to death projects that would have benefited their people enormously.

* In the 1970’s, the Schwab-founded, Soros-funded World Economic Forum (WEF) began to gather the world’s notables into annual conventions in Davos, Switzerland. There they discussed globalization and other aspects of one-world governance which they, the aristocratic alphas, would naturally control.

* The Comintern failed in its mission to establish a one-world, socialist dictatorship headquartered in Moscow. When the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics crashed in 1989, the Socialist Internationale moved to the United Nations. The UN has long been the home base for one-world government advocates.

* These three mega-groups – Climate Catastrophists, the Davos Gang, and Socialist Internationale, are joined/supported by some individuals in commerce or industry who have earned fortunes, and, by some individuals in movies or TV who have received tons of money for their play-acting. They think their wealth somehow entitles them to control the rest of the world’s people by dictating the conditions in which they will be allowed to live.

* Some resetters, including the Pope and Obama, met at the UN in New york City the weekend of September 25-27, 2015 to finalize the seventeen objectives of their Agenda 21 (2021) that  were meant to control everybody’s life in their one-world, socialist dictatorship. By then, it was obvious that the polar sea ice was not going to disappear by 2021, so they changed the target date to 2030! Whenever that date is mentioned, alarm bells should go off !

I’ve written this memo to you in the hope it will prompt one, some or all of you to form a working group that can inform and persuade enough Canadians to understand what’s happening to our blessed country and change its future. You have the status and stature, the skills and resources. Please do something before it’s too late.




on | Filed under Climate Change, Global Warming

It’s sad to see how far down the diversity rabbit hole we’ve been driven. Diversity – Division – Divide. Canadians have been bombarded with the claim that Canada is a mosaic. Think about that. A mosaic is made of pieces of coloured glass or tile stuck in place and divided from each other by cement!

No matter when or from where we came, the snow falls on all of us. There is only one Canada. There are about 37 million unique and distinct individual persons in it.

However, have you noticed the obscene number of occasions recently that have frustrated Canadians’ ability to get things done? We’re lost in a blizzard of blockades. Radical minorities claiming to speak for aboriginal, religious, ancestral or sex-preference minorities, or wasteful/incompetent provincial governments, or climate crazies, have all chosen blocking of action beneficial to the majority of Canadians as their main purpose in life.

“When the minority is able to frustrate action by the majority, it becomes a tyranny.” Ascribed to Thomas B. Reed, Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives 1890 to 1899.

“The first test of a democracy is not how it treats its minorities, but how it serves its majority. Does the great bulk of the population live in an environment of civil liberty, social security and economic opportunity?” William Thorsell, Globe & Mail, January 8, 2000.

The tyranny of minorities has become a colossal problem for Canada. It has to stop.

Climate Change Swindlers

on | Filed under Global Warming

We Need To Delete The Climate Change Swindlers 


First some scientific facts. Global climate warms and cools. We are living in an Ice Age that began about 40 million years ago, in a warming Interglacial that began about 20,000 years ago, in a warming Period that began about 1850, and in a short term cooling phase that began about 2002. The Roman warming Period lasted about 450 years from 250 BC to 200 AD. The next three Periods before ours each lasted about 550 years –  the Dark Ages cooling Period from 200 AD to 750 AD, the Medieval warming Period from 750 AD to 1300 AD, and the “Little Ice Age” cooling Period from 1300 AD to 1850 AD. Read the rest of this entry »

Saul Alinsky

on | Filed under Governance

Saul David Alinsky, a writer, was an American community organizer and writer. He is generally considered to be the founder of the modern community organizing movement. He is most noted for his book ‘Rules for Radicals’.

Died: June 12, 1972, Carmel-by-the-Sea, CA
Education: University of Chicago
Spouse: Irene Alinsky
Books: Rules for Radicals, Reveille for Radicals

“How to create a social state.” by Saul Alinsky:
“There are eight levels of control that must be obtained before you are able to create a social state.” Read the rest of this entry »

Warming and Cooling Predictions

on | Filed under Global Warming

A partial list of predictions and comments over 117 years

Source: Press Release, “Earth Day 2008: Predictions of Environmental Disaster Were Wrong,” Washington Policy Center, April 22, 2008.

“Is our climate changing? The succession of temperate summers and open winters through several years, culminating last winter in the almost total failure of the ice crop throughout the valley of the Hudson, makes the question pertinent. The older inhabitants tell us that the winters are not as cold now as when they were young, and we have all observed a marked diminution of the average cold even in this last decade. – New York Times, June 23, 1890  Read the rest of this entry »

How Did Jefferson Know?

on | Filed under Governance

John F. Kennedy held a dinner in the white House for a group of the brightest minds in the nation at that time. He made this statement:

“This is perhaps the assembly of the most intelligence ever to gather at one time in the White House with the exception of when Thomas Jefferson dined alone.”

“When we get piled upon one another in large cities, as in Europe, we shall become as corrupt as Europe .”

“The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not.”
Read the rest of this entry »

Brave New World?

on | Filed under Uncategorized

The following italicized paragraphs are extracted from my essay; “The Personalist Manifest” completed in September, 1998, and forming part of my collection of six essays collectively entitled, “Personalism v. Socialism” published in spring 2001.

It is amazing how accurately Mr. Huxley foresaw the future. It is horrifying how much more quickly it is occurring than even he anticipated.

Aldous Huxley wrote the classic future fiction novel “Brave New World” in 1932. Huxley was a brilliant scholar and ardent socialist, until he saw the Soviet Union in action! The story is set about 2,500 AD, mainly in England.

In “Brave New World”, the oligarchic elites have gone way beyond the 20th Century socialist dictators who controlled by mass slaughters, planned famines, gulags, re-education “camps” and other nasty goings‑on. Those methods were much too inefficient. In the future “ideal” socialist state, the oligarchic elites control a peaceable population of mindless drones who love their slavery ‑ who can’t even conceive of an alternative. Read the rest of this entry »

Is Capitalism Conservative?

on | Filed under Governance

“The word ‘capitalism’ was coined by Karl Marx who hoped this labelling would help in his crusade to denigrate the system of private property and market enterprise and promote socialism.” [from a book review published in the Ludwig Von Mises Institute’s DAILY ARTICLE.]

But ‘capitalism’ is a very limited, specific term for one of the three ways humans do business where ‘business’ involves some or all of the processes of producing, distributing and exchanging goods and services. ‘Barter’ and ‘mercantilism’ are the other two terms.

Marx believed that business was the sole concern of humanity – that man was just an economic animal. Of course this is false – human activity involves much more than just business. But, he was so successful in persuading a substantial majority of the linguistic and educator communities to his view, that, for at least the last two generations, ‘capitalism’ has been elevated to the same level as, and the antithesis of, ‘socialism’ Read the rest of this entry »

Reds Are Socialists

on | Filed under Governance

In the election when President Ronald Reagan won all but one state, a commentator described a map of the results as looking like a “blue lake”.

When posting the results of the 2000 presidential election, a history-challenged TV graphics person coloured the democratic states blue and the republican states red. For some inexplicable reason, the entire media establishment of the USA mindlessly continues to perpetuate that ridiculous error.

For more than 200 years red has been the colour of socialists – red army, red Chinese, REDS, etc., and blue has been the colour of conservatives. All the rest of the world still does this.

It might help sort out out the confusions in people’s minds if the US media returned to calling the Democrats “Reds” and the Republicans “Blues”!